ConnorYohandGitHub 43b67d213d feat(oauth2): opt-in claim-dump diagnostics for OIDC login failures (#6456)
# Description of Changes

## What & why

Customers using ADFS (or any generic OIDC provider that doesn't emit
`email`) hit `Attribute value for 'email' cannot be null` during OAuth2
login with no visibility into what claims the provider actually sent.
The only available remedy was guessing at
`security.oauth2.useAsUsername` until something worked.

This PR adds a new opt-in `security.oauth2.debugLogging` flag (default
`false`). When enabled, `CustomOAuth2UserService` logs:

- All ID token claims (sorted, with values)
- All UserInfo endpoint claims (if any)
- The merged attribute key set Spring exposes to `getAttribute()`
- The value the configured `useAsUsername` actually resolved to
- A **`Hint:`** line listing the claim keys present in the token that
map to a valid `UsernameAttribute` enum value — i.e. exactly what the
operator could put in `useAsUsername` to make login work

Logged at `INFO` on the success path and `ERROR` on failure (inside the
existing `catch (IllegalArgumentException)` block that throws
`OAuth2AuthenticationException`). The block is wrapped with a `[OAUTH2
DEBUG] ... [/OAUTH2 DEBUG]` banner and ends with a PII warning so
operators don't leave it on in production.

Default off → zero observable change for anyone not actively
troubleshooting.

## Files changed

| File | Why |
|---|---|
| `app/common/.../ApplicationProperties.java` | New `debugLogging` field
on the `OAUTH2` config class with javadoc warning about PII |
| `app/core/src/main/resources/settings.yml.template` | Documents
`oauth2.debugLogging` so it appears on next startup |
| `app/proprietary/.../security/service/CustomOAuth2UserService.java` |
Emits the claim dump + suggestion hint when the flag is on |
|
`app/proprietary/.../security/service/CustomOAuth2UserServiceDebugLoggingTest.java`
(new) | Unit test: mocks the OIDC delegate, asserts off-path is silent
and on-path emits the dump with the right Hint contents |

## End-to-end verification

Ran the bundled `testing/compose/docker-compose-keycloak-oauth.yml`
Keycloak realm, configured `security.oauth2.useAsUsername: mail`
(Keycloak emits `email`, not `mail`) and `provider: demarest` (matches
the original customer bug report). Triggered the OAuth flow at
`http://localhost:8080/oauth2/authorization/demarest` and confirmed:

- The ERROR-level dump fires with the full 19-claim ID token decoded
- `-- Value at 'mail' : <NULL — this is why login fails>` correctly
identifies the missing claim
- `-- Hint:` correctly suggests `[email, family_name, given_name,
preferred_username]` (the four keys present that map to valid
`UsernameAttribute` values)
- Auth still fails with the original `OAuth2AuthenticationException` —
no change to control flow, just added diagnostic logging

Unit test (`CustomOAuth2UserServiceDebugLoggingTest`) covers both
branches.

## Reviewer notes

- **No new public APIs.** The flag is config-only; no servlet endpoints
exposed.
- **PII is logged when the flag is on.** This is the whole point —
operators need to see the claims to fix their config — but it's gated,
defaults off, and the dump self-documents with a `WARNING: ... Set
security.oauth2.debugLogging=false once troubleshooting is complete.`
footer.
- **Why log everything, not just sub/email?** Because the operator
doesn't know in advance which claim they actually want. ADFS uses `upn`
in some configs and `preferred_username` in others; Azure AD uses `oid`;
the customer here had neither. Dumping the full set is the only way to
make the diagnostic self-service.
- **Out of scope for this PR (follow-ups):**
- The `UsernameAttribute` enum doesn't include `upn` / `unique_name`
(common ADFS claims). If the customer's token only has `upn`, the Hint
will be empty even though the operator can see `upn` in the dump. Worth
a separate PR to extend the enum.
- The known-provider validator in `Provider.java` (rejects e.g.
`useAsUsername: mail` for `provider: keycloak` at startup) bypasses our
diagnostic for those provider names. ADFS customers using `provider:
<name>` fall into the `default` branch so are not affected — but it's a
sharp edge worth documenting.

---

## Checklist

### General

- [x] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable) — N/A, backend-only change
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings

### Documentation

- [ ] Doc-repo update (if functionality has heavily changed) —
diagnostic flag is self-documenting via the `settings.yml.template`
comment and the in-log warning; happy to add a doc-repo entry if
reviewers want one
- [ ] Translation tags — N/A

### UI Changes (if applicable)

- [ ] N/A — backend-only

### Testing (if applicable)

- [x] Unit test added (`CustomOAuth2UserServiceDebugLoggingTest`)
covering on/off paths and Hint correctness
- [x] End-to-end verified locally against bundled Keycloak compose with
intentionally misconfigured `useAsUsername`
- [x] Full `:proprietary:test` suite passes
2026-05-27 13:01:51 +00:00
2026-05-26 14:40:44 +00:00
2026-05-26 14:40:44 +00:00
2026-05-22 13:40:34 +01:00
2026-03-25 11:00:40 +00:00
2026-05-21 16:05:35 +01:00
2026-03-25 11:00:40 +00:00

Stirling PDF logo

Stirling PDF - The Open-Source PDF Platform

Stirling PDF is a powerful, open-source PDF editing platform. Run it as a personal desktop app, in the browser, or deploy it on your own servers with a private API. Edit, sign, redact, convert, and automate PDFs without sending documents to external services.

Docker Pulls Discord OpenSSF Scorecard GitHub Repo stars

Stirling PDF - Dashboard

Key Capabilities

  • Everywhere you work - Desktop client, browser UI, and self-hosted server with a private API.
  • 50+ PDF tools - Edit, merge, split, sign, redact, convert, OCR, compress, and more.
  • Automation & workflows - No-code pipelines direct in UI with APIs to process millions of PDFs.
  • Enterprisegrade - SSO, auditing, and flexible onprem deployments.
  • Developer platform - REST APIs available for nearly all tools to integrate into your existing systems.
  • Global UI - Interface available in 40+ languages.

For a full feature list, see the docs: https://docs.stirlingpdf.com

Quick Start

docker run -p 8080:8080 docker.stirlingpdf.com/stirlingtools/stirling-pdf

Then open: http://localhost:8080

For full installation options (including desktop and Kubernetes), see our Documentation Guide.

Resources

Support

Contributing

We welcome contributions! Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines.

This project uses Task as a unified command runner for all build, dev, and test commands. Run task install to get started, or see the Developer Guide for full details.

For adding translations, see the Translation Guide.

License

Stirling PDF is open-core. See LICENSE for details.

S
Description
#1 Locally hosted web application that allows you to perform various operations on PDF files
Readme MIT
252 MiB
PDF
Latest
2024-06-04 23:05:35 +02:00
Languages
Java 45.2%
TypeScript 43.2%
Python 5.3%
CSS 2.9%
Shell 1.1%
Other 2.2%