mirror of
https://github.com/arsvendg/Stirling-PDF.git
synced 2026-07-14 10:34:06 +02:00
## Summary Adds a new AI specialist that finds **textual contradictions** across one or more PDFs — conflicting claims, recommendations, points of view, contested facts — built entirely in Python on top of the new `DocumentService` + `ChunkedReasoner` stack from #6314. Replaces the closed #6304, which was started before #6314 landed and therefore over-engineered (Java orchestrator, two-round handshake, resume artifact, discriminated-union lift). Two commits: 1. **`refactor(engine): extract ChunkedMapper[T] from ChunkedReasoner`** — pure refactor, public API of ChunkedReasoner unchanged. New `ChunkedMapper[T: BaseModel]` is a generic parallel-chunk primitive (slicing, semaphore, time-bounded extraction, cancellation drain, progress events) that's now a peer to ChunkedReasoner rather than locked inside it. The compression loop stays on ChunkedReasoner where it belongs. 2. **`feat(ai): add Contradiction Agent on ChunkedMapper`** — the agent itself, plus integrations into `PdfReviewAgent` and `PdfQuestionAgent`. ## Architecture - **Python-only.** No Java code. No `AgentToolId.CONTRADICTION_AGENT`. No dedicated HTTP endpoint. No resume artifact, no discriminated-union lift in `contracts/common.py`. Detector runs inside the Python engine and the Python engine alone. - **Review path** (`PdfReviewAgent`): a new `ContradictionIntentClassifier` fires on contradiction-flavoured prompts; agent runs detection synchronously and emits a single `EditPlanResponse(steps=[ADD_COMMENTS])`. Single-turn flow — no resume. - **Question path** (`PdfQuestionAgent`): a new `ContradictionCapability` joins `RagCapability` and `WholeDocReaderCapability` in the smart-model toolset, exposing `find_contradictions(query)`. The smart model picks it from the toolset alongside `search_knowledge` and `read_full_document`. ## Inside `ContradictionDetector.detect()` 1. `DocumentService.read_pages(file_id)` → ordered `list[Page]`. 2. `ChunkedMapper[_ExtractedClaims].map_pages(...)` — char-budgeted multi-page slicing; each slice runs the claim-extractor LLM in parallel under a semaphore. 3. Page-traceability: the extractor returns `_ExtractedClaim.page` (which `[Page N]` marker the claim came from). The wrapper validates `page ∈ chunk.pages`; if not, mechanical fallback searches the chunk's page text for the verbatim quote and reassigns. If still no match, drop the claim. 4. `Claim.anchor_quality: Literal[\"verbatim\", \"paraphrased\"]` is set by a substring check against the declared page's text. Verbatim quotes feed `anchor_text` for snap-to-quote add-comments placement; paraphrased ones fall back to margin geometry. 5. Subject canonicalisation: ONE fast-model LLM call collapses synonyms across the document. Fails open to lexical bucketing. 6. Pre-filters: drop identical-quote pairs; drop same-page same-polarity paraphrases. 7. Per-bucket pair detection in parallel (separate semaphore, cap 5). Buckets > 12 claims chunk into windows of 12 with overlap 2; pairs deduped across overlapping windows by frozen `(i, j)` index pair. 8. Summary fast-model call with fallback string on error. ## Prompt-injection hardening Every prompt that interpolates user-supplied or PDF-extracted text wraps content in `<user_message>` / `<verdict>` / `<content>` tags with an explicit SECURITY preamble instructing the model to treat tagged content as data only. ## Limitations - **Combined math + contradiction intent**: when both intent classifiers fire on the same prompt, contradiction takes precedence and the math intent is silently dropped. Documented in the Review module docstring and pinned by `test_review_integration.py::test_contradiction_precedence_over_math`. - **Cross-window contradiction reach**: within a subject bucket, pairs more than ~10 claim indices apart in the same chunked window may be missed by the overlap-2 strategy. Documented in `test_detector.py`. Acceptable for v1. ## Settings (engine/src/stirling/config/settings.py) ```python contradiction_detect_concurrency = 5 # per-bucket detector semaphore contradiction_bucket_chunk_size = 12 # max claims per detector call contradiction_bucket_chunk_overlap = 2 # overlap for >threshold buckets ``` `chars_per_slice` and extraction concurrency are reused from the existing `chunked_reasoner_*` settings. ## Test plan - [x] `uv run pytest tests/ -v` — **245/245 pass** (210 pre-existing + 35 new) - [x] `uv run ruff check src/ tests/` — clean - [x] `uv run pyright src/stirling/agents/contradiction/ src/stirling/contracts/contradiction.py` — 0 errors - [x] `./gradlew :proprietary:test` — green; no Java was touched, but verified untouched - [x] Page-traceability tests cover: valid page kept, hallucinated page dropped, mechanical-reassign on misattribution, anchor-quality verbatim vs paraphrased - [x] Review integration: ADD_COMMENTS plan with two paired CommentSpecs per contradiction; NeedIngestResponse precheck; precedence vs math intent pinned - [x] Question integration: all three capabilities wired into smart-model toolset; `find_contradictions` returns formatted report text - [x] ChunkedMapper standalone: slicing, multi-chunk ordering, worker failures, timeouts, cancellation drain, semaphore saturation - [x] ChunkedReasoner regression: all pre-existing tests pass unchanged after the internal split ## Relationship to closed #6304 #6304 was closed in favour of this PR. The closed PR predated #6314 and modelled the agent as a Java-orchestrated two-round examine/deliberate flow with its own HTTP endpoint and a discriminated-union resume artifact. With #6314 making full ordered page text available to the engine via `DocumentService.read_pages`, none of that is needed. Net effect: drop ~600 lines of Java, drop the two-round handshake, drop the `ToolReportArtifact` lift, while ending up with a more scalable agent (chunk-based instead of page-based extraction; tested to ChunkedReasoner-equivalent scale).
158 lines
4.8 KiB
Python
158 lines
4.8 KiB
Python
"""ClaimLedger — unit tests.
|
|
|
|
Tests the lexical-normalisation grouping, ``rekey_with_canonical``
|
|
re-grouping behaviour, and the ``buckets`` filter (>= 2 only). The
|
|
ledger is the source of truth for which canonical-subject buckets get
|
|
fed to the contradiction detector, so its grouping rules are part of
|
|
the agent's contract.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
from stirling.agents.contradiction.validators import ClaimLedger
|
|
from stirling.contracts.contradiction import Claim, ClaimPolarity
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _claim(
|
|
subject: str,
|
|
*,
|
|
page: int = 1,
|
|
polarity: ClaimPolarity = "assert",
|
|
text: str | None = None,
|
|
quote: str | None = None,
|
|
) -> Claim:
|
|
return Claim(
|
|
page=page,
|
|
subject=subject,
|
|
polarity=polarity,
|
|
text=text or f"Paraphrase of {subject}",
|
|
quote=quote or f'"{subject}" was found here.',
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.fixture
|
|
def ledger() -> ClaimLedger:
|
|
return ClaimLedger()
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Empty ledger
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_empty_ledger_has_zero_entries(ledger: ClaimLedger) -> None:
|
|
assert ledger.entry_count == 0
|
|
assert ledger.buckets() == {}
|
|
assert ledger.unique_subjects == []
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Singletons are not buckets
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_single_claim_subject_is_not_a_bucket(ledger: ClaimLedger) -> None:
|
|
"""``buckets`` only emits subjects with >= 2 claims (the detector's input shape)."""
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("Project Deadline"))
|
|
assert ledger.entry_count == 1
|
|
assert ledger.buckets() == {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Lexical normalisation
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_lexical_normalisation_collapses_articles_and_punctuation(
|
|
ledger: ClaimLedger,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""All three of these subjects must hash to the same key.
|
|
|
|
The lexical key strips: lowercase, articles ("the"/"a"/"an"), and
|
|
punctuation/whitespace runs.
|
|
"""
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("Project Deadline:", page=1))
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("the project deadline", page=2))
|
|
ledger.record(_claim(" PROJECT DEADLINE ", page=3))
|
|
|
|
buckets = ledger.buckets()
|
|
assert len(buckets) == 1
|
|
only_bucket = next(iter(buckets.values()))
|
|
assert len(only_bucket) == 3
|
|
assert {claim.page for claim in only_bucket} == {1, 2, 3}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_duplicates_not_deduped_at_ledger_level(ledger: ClaimLedger) -> None:
|
|
"""Two structurally identical claims are both kept; deduplication is the
|
|
detector's responsibility, not the ledger's."""
|
|
claim = _claim("alpha", page=1)
|
|
ledger.record(claim)
|
|
ledger.record(claim)
|
|
assert ledger.entry_count == 2
|
|
bucket = ledger.buckets()
|
|
assert len(bucket) == 1
|
|
assert len(next(iter(bucket.values()))) == 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
# rekey_with_canonical
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_canonical_keys_collapse_multiple_raw_subjects(ledger: ClaimLedger) -> None:
|
|
"""Two distinct raw subjects must collapse once the canonicaliser tells us
|
|
they refer to the same thing."""
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("Q3 revenue", page=1))
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("third-quarter sales", page=2))
|
|
|
|
# Before rekeying, they live in separate (singleton) lexical buckets.
|
|
assert ledger.buckets() == {}
|
|
|
|
ledger.rekey_with_canonical(
|
|
{
|
|
"Q3 revenue": "quarterly revenue",
|
|
"third-quarter sales": "quarterly revenue",
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
buckets = ledger.buckets()
|
|
assert len(buckets) == 1
|
|
only_bucket = next(iter(buckets.values()))
|
|
assert len(only_bucket) == 2
|
|
assert {claim.page for claim in only_bucket} == {1, 2}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_rekey_with_missing_canonical_falls_back_to_lexical(
|
|
ledger: ClaimLedger,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""A claim whose subject is missing from the mapping must still survive
|
|
re-keying — its lexical-normalised form takes over as the key."""
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("alpha", page=1))
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("alpha", page=2))
|
|
ledger.rekey_with_canonical({})
|
|
assert ledger.entry_count == 2
|
|
buckets = ledger.buckets()
|
|
assert len(buckets) == 1
|
|
assert len(next(iter(buckets.values()))) == 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_rekey_with_empty_canonical_does_not_lose_record(
|
|
ledger: ClaimLedger,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""A canonical of "" or whitespace must NOT cause silent drop — the
|
|
lexical fallback kicks in instead.
|
|
"""
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("alpha", page=1))
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("alpha", page=2))
|
|
ledger.rekey_with_canonical({"alpha": " "})
|
|
assert ledger.entry_count == 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_unique_subjects_returns_each_raw_subject_once(ledger: ClaimLedger) -> None:
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("alpha", page=1))
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("alpha", page=2))
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("beta", page=1))
|
|
subjects = ledger.unique_subjects
|
|
assert sorted(subjects) == ["alpha", "beta"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_empty_subject_after_normalisation_is_dropped(ledger: ClaimLedger) -> None:
|
|
"""A subject made entirely of punctuation collapses to empty and is dropped."""
|
|
ledger.record(_claim(" --- ", page=1))
|
|
ledger.record(_claim("real", page=2))
|
|
assert ledger.entry_count == 1
|