# Description of Changes
When I added Prettier formatting in #6052, my aim was to use just the
default settings in Prettier. Turns out, Prettier looks _really hard_
for any config files if it's not explicitly given one, which means that
if a developer has some sort of Prettier config file lying around on
their system, Prettier might find it and use it. Also, Prettier changes
its defaults based on stuff in `.editorconfig` without any good way of
disabling that behaviour explicitly in its config file.
To solve both of these issues, I've introduced a `.prettierrc` file
which sets Prettier's defaults explicitly, and then reformatted all our
code _again_ in Prettier's actual default settings. This should achieve
the aim of #6052 and remove the possibility for it breaking on different
dev computers.
# Description of Changes
Changes the strategy for autoformatting to reject PRs if they are not
formatted correctly instead of allowing them to merge and then spawning
a new PR to fix the formatting. The old strategy just caused more work
for us because we'd have to manually approve the followup PR and get it
merged, which required 2 reviewers so in practice it rarely got done and
just meant everyone's PRs ended up containing reformatting for unrelated
files, which makes code review unnecessarily difficult. If the PR's code
is not formatted correctly after this PR, a comment will be added
automatically to tell the author how to run the formatter script to fix
their code so it can go in.
This also enables autoformatting for the frontend code, using Prettier.
I've enabled it for pretty much everything in the frontend folder, other
than 3rd party files and files it doesn't make sense for. I also
excluded Markdown because it sounds likely to be more annoying to have
to autoformat the Markdown in the frontend folder but nowhere else. Open
to changing this though if people disagree.
> [!note]
>
> Advice to reviewers: The first commit contains all of the actual logic
I've introduced (CI changes, Prettier config, etc.)
> The second commit is just the reformatting of the entire frontend
folder.
> The first commit needs proper review, the second one just give it a
spot-check that it's doing what you'd expect.
# Description of Changes
This PR fixes false-positive TypeScript errors in our layered build
setup (core → proprietary → desktop) by ensuring each build’s typecheck
only evaluates files that are actually part of that build’s reachable
module graph. This prevents overridden core implementations from being
typechecked in higher-layer builds where they are effectively
unreachable due to alias-based overrides.
## Background
We maintain multiple build targets from a layered source tree:
- core: open source baseline
- proprietary: core + proprietary additions/overrides
- desktop: proprietary + desktop-specific additions/overrides
We implement overrides via paths/aliases such that placing a file in a
higher layer at the same relative path supersedes the lower-layer file
at runtime.
For safety, we run TypeScript typechecking independently per build
target to ensure all builds remain valid.
## Problem
Our existing tsconfig setup often typechecked files that are not
actually reachable in a given build. Specifically:
- When a file in core is overridden by a file in proprietary or desktop,
the overridden core file can still be included in the TypeScript Program
for the higher-layer build (typically due to broad include globs).
- This produces false-positive type errors in higher-layer typecheck
runs, even though those core files are effectively unreachable in the
build.
This created friction and noise, and meant we had to make unnecessary
changes to `core` to make the other builds happy, reducing type safety
in the process.
## Solution
This PR adjusts the tsconfig strategy so each build target's typecheck
is driven by reachable entrypoints rather than blanket inclusion of all
layer source trees. Concretely:
- Each build’s tsconfig now includes only:
- that build’s entrypoints and layer sources that are intended to be
compiled for the target
- any shared/top-level sources required by the target
- Lower layers (e.g., core) are not globally included in higher-layer
builds; they are instead pulled in through module resolution only when
actually referenced (with paths ordering ensuring the correct override
wins).
- This means that we still check all the files that will actually be run
with whatever the overridden logic is, but avoid wasting time and
introducing false-positives by not checking files which have been
overridden.
## Notes
Unfortunately, the config we use for the type checking can't be the same
as the one we use for Vite in this strategy. Vite needs to know about
the entire source tree, so it can't only include the subfolders because
it causes build errors. Because of this, I've duplicated the existing
(valid) tsconfig files and use them for Vite. This is a little clunky
but it does the job. Some day hopefully I'll come back to it and be able
to figure out a nicer way to do it, but for now at least, this solves
the type checking issues without impacting the runtime builds.
Also, I noticed that `@desktop` is defined as an alias, which was
presumably missed when I was removing the self-aliases from the files. I
don't see why you'd ever need to have a desktop file reference
`@desktop` to say "import this but make it impossible for something else
to override the import". I've removed the `@desktop` alias in this PR
while I was in there.
James BruntonandGitHub
Balázs SzücsandGitHub